From: Donncha O Caoimh (donncha.ocaoimh at domain tradesignals.com)
Date: Tue 02 May 2000 - 17:36:23 IST
You should see some of the posts about this in the archives, both on
this list and on the CLUG list, hot topic when it gets going!
I'm in favour of the current method of replying (reply to sender, not
list) but there are valid reasons for having the reply set to "reply to
list" as well, although I believe it breaks RFCs or something..
Pigs will fly :)
"McDaid, Aaron" wrote:
> I find it somewhat confusing when one
> doesn't know whether or not a reply
> to an ILUG post should be "reply-to-all"
> or just send the mail to ilug at domain linux.ie
> The latter would cause anyone not on the
> list to miss out (obviously!). This could
> happen if the original poster was not on
> the list (unlikely I suppose) or maybe
> if someone on-list sent the mail to a friend
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu 06 Feb 2003 - 13:05:59 GMT