Re: [ILUG] fixing Ilug's addressing - Thanks anyway

From: Ross Lynch (ross at domain onesphere.net)
Date: Wed 03 May 2000 - 13:43:19 IST

Next message: Stephen Bourke: "[ILUG] (no subject)"
Previous message: Niall: "Re: [ILUG] shell script question"
In reply to: McDaid, Aaron: "RE: [ILUG] fixing Ilug's addressing - Thanks anyway"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

"McDaid, Aaron" wrote:

...
> I just think it's possible for the list software to make
> sure everyone in that thread gets the mails once and once
> only.
...

What exactally does the mailman 'metoo' option do? I'm not sure how it
works but I think it might have something to do with this...

Ross.

-- 
Ross Lynch
087 6548827
ross at domain onesphere.net
kernel at domain student.nuigalway.ie

Next message: Stephen Bourke: "[ILUG] (no subject)"
Previous message: Niall: "Re: [ILUG] shell script question"
In reply to: McDaid, Aaron: "RE: [ILUG] fixing Ilug's addressing - Thanks anyway"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu 06 Feb 2003 - 13:06:00 GMT