[ILUG] [way-ot] darklight.com should, never, ever, be considered for web-anything
- Next message: PoweredByApache at domain aol.com: "Re: [ILUG] high res pic of Tux"
- Previous message: Albert White: "Re: [ILUG] probably a silly question"
- Next in thread: Alan Sobey: "Re: [ILUG] [way-ot] darklight.com should, never, ever, be considered for web-anything"
- Reply: Alan Sobey: "Re: [ILUG] [way-ot] darklight.com should, never, ever, be considered for web-anything"
- Reply: Niall: "Re: [ILUG] [way-ot] darklight.com should, never, ever, be considered for web-anything"
- Reply: Philip Reynolds: "Re: [ILUG] [way-ot] darklight.com should, never, ever, be considered for web-anything"
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
[ attachment ]
- Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
sorry to be so blunt, but that fscking scrolling ad banner flying about
my screen is reason enough to never consider them. the only way to stop
it is to turn of javascript. how exactly is that supposed to
demonstrate:
a) a good service
b) good web site design
c) a sane attitude to their customers
up until today the worst web site i ever saw was a dukes of hazzard web
site with approximately 50 animated gifs - all with a classy dukes of
hazzard theme. and then there's the geocities watermark, but no,
darklight.com decides to try to do both at once! fantastic.
not.
i don't care whether they take irish punts or shekels, i sincerely hope
no one here considers them, recommends them, or does anything with them
besides buy up their servers in a bankruptcy sale.
kevin, calming down...
--
kevin at domain suberic.net "we were goin' for breakfast. in canada. we
fork()'ed on 37058400 made a deal: if she'd stop hookin', i'd stop
meatspace place: home shootin' people. maybe we were aiming high."
--porter, "payback"
- Next message: PoweredByApache at domain aol.com: "Re: [ILUG] high res pic of Tux"
- Previous message: Albert White: "Re: [ILUG] probably a silly question"
- Next in thread: Alan Sobey: "Re: [ILUG] [way-ot] darklight.com should, never, ever, be considered for web-anything"
- Reply: Alan Sobey: "Re: [ILUG] [way-ot] darklight.com should, never, ever, be considered for web-anything"
- Reply: Niall: "Re: [ILUG] [way-ot] darklight.com should, never, ever, be considered for web-anything"
- Reply: Philip Reynolds: "Re: [ILUG] [way-ot] darklight.com should, never, ever, be considered for web-anything"
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
[ attachment ]
- Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6
: Thu 06 Feb 2003 - 13:06:03 GMT