Re: [ILUG] M$Orifice for Linux

From: Justin Mason (jm at domain jmason.org)
Date: Wed 10 May 2000 - 11:59:58 IST


"Caolan McNamara" said:

> No point waiting for something which is even less than vapourware, its
> just standard ms mechanism for frightening competitors and freezing
> customers. Its existence as a rumour is probably more useful than its
> reality. MS also let it be known that Office2k would use xml as its
> native file format, I had a few small wv contracts that pulled out of a
> funding discussion because they believed the hype that they would be able
> to parse .doc's with xml tools. Believing a single word about a ms
> product before you can put your own hands on it yourself is a fatal
> error.

I'd like to agree with this. This is exactly what happened to
PenWindows...

  * company C (Go Computers) writes small, cool OS, PenPoint, built around
  pen input (long time before the Palm BTW)

  * customer base B oohs and aahs

  * company A says "oh never mind that, here is the magic of PenWindows"
  ("It's Windows! but with a pen!")

  * customer base B says to itself "I will wait until that
  is available, then I will buy that" as Caolan said

  * company C goes bust

It's like, what, about 10 years on? And still no PenWindows. What a
surprise! There's lots of other examples (Netscape being the obvious
one), and they've applied this strategy across the board, even for things
like middleware technologies.

BTW regarding Junkbuster -- if you're on RH, use Stefan Waldherr's
version, it's nicely set up with lots of preconfigured details:
http://www.waldherr.org/junkbuster/download.shtml . I'd also suggest
modifying it a little to be less fascist about cookies; by default it'll
block everything, I prefer blocking specific sites' cookies so I can log
in to slashdot, advogato, etc.

--j.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu 06 Feb 2003 - 13:06:05 GMT