Re: [ILUG] Init vs telinit

From: Paul Jakma (paulj at domain itg.ie)
Date: Wed 17 May 2000 - 10:50:48 IST


On Wed, 17 May 2000, John P. Looney wrote:

> > The BSDs and related (DU, SunOS4) OTOH don't seem to.
>
> Most likely because they don't have the concept of "Runlevels" ?
>

Sure? (any *BSD afficionados out there?) Digital Unix at least has
runlevels, (though no rc.d/rc?.d/ symlinks dirs afair) and it has a strong
BSD heritage.
 
> The reason it's there is that originally, init was not to be run by users
> - just the kernel on boot. So, it was the only way of changing them.
> SVr2/3 or something made init a little more personable, but they kept
> telinit.
>

don't you love it when your OS has a sense of history? :)

> Kate
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu 06 Feb 2003 - 13:06:11 GMT