RE: [ILUG] [Going OT] Beginner needs shell account

From: Peter McEvoy (peter.mcevoy at domain iona.com)
Date: Wed 17 May 2000 - 15:41:06 IST

• Next message: Vincent Cunniffe: "[ILUG] mailman on linux"
• Previous message: Donncha O Caoimh: "Re: [ILUG] [OT] GPL and non-disclosure agreements"
• In reply to: Diarmaid O'Loughlin: "RE: [ILUG] [Going OT] Beginner needs shell account"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

> The hack doesn't remove the only 1 user on a lan restriction.... That's
> what might of been causing the problem.
>

I'm sure we must've glossed over that one when reading the install doc
then - surely tho that level of protection is WAY overboard - particularly
since it actually lets 2 instances run and still gives that annoying 30min
warning (while behind the scenes destroying every packet...). Subversive
copy protection is a new one on me.... sheesh.

Pete

• Next message: Vincent Cunniffe: "[ILUG] mailman on linux"
• Previous message: Donncha O Caoimh: "Re: [ILUG] [OT] GPL and non-disclosure agreements"
• In reply to: Diarmaid O'Loughlin: "RE: [ILUG] [Going OT] Beginner needs shell account"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu 06 Feb 2003 - 13:06:11 GMT