Re: [ILUG] 2.3 kernel

From: Paul Jakma (paulj at domain itg.ie)
Date: Mon 22 May 2000 - 12:07:16 IST

• Next message: Guest, Ken: "RE: [ILUG] linux.ie clothes"
• Previous message: Stephen Shirley: "Re: [ILUG] 2.3 kernel"
• In reply to: Stephen Shirley: "Re: [ILUG] 2.3 kernel"
• Next in thread: John P. Looney (Kate): "Re: [ILUG] 2.3 kernel"
• Reply: John P. Looney (Kate): "Re: [ILUG] 2.3 kernel"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On Mon, 22 May 2000, Stephen Shirley wrote:

> and from what I can gather the memory allocation stuff is quite
> shagged at up at the mo.

pre7 is horrible. pre8 is dreadful. pre9-2 is ok. pre9-3 is horrible
again.

so pre9-2 is the one to go for.

--paulj

• Next message: Guest, Ken: "RE: [ILUG] linux.ie clothes"
• Previous message: Stephen Shirley: "Re: [ILUG] 2.3 kernel"
• In reply to: Stephen Shirley: "Re: [ILUG] 2.3 kernel"
• Next in thread: John P. Looney (Kate): "Re: [ILUG] 2.3 kernel"
• Reply: John P. Looney (Kate): "Re: [ILUG] 2.3 kernel"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu 06 Feb 2003 - 13:06:14 GMT