From: lbedford at domain wbtsystems.com
Date: Mon 29 May 2000 - 09:05:46 IST
On Mon, May 29, 2000 at 08:47:26AM +0100, Vincent Cunniffe wrote:
> Conor Daly wrote:
> > Now, the only difference in the last post was that I used a valid email
> > address rather than a spoofed one and specified the text only editor rather
> > than the HTML editor. I wonder which made the difference?
> The HTML content doesn't make any different (apart from annoying people
> who don't have a HTML-aware mail reader (and lots who do ;-))
Don't forget mailman can be set to refuse mails with attachments (I think),
or mails over a certain size.. maybe the HTML put it over the limit.
I know mails with binary attachments have been blocked before..
Then again, I think the .NOSPAM.net might have been your problem,
I don't think .NOSPAM.net exists..
(And don't test with html mail, please.. :))
-- Liam Bedford | Obscure, la force est noire System Administrator | Comme le chateau où flotte l'etendard, WBT Systems, Block 2, | notre drapeau Sois sûr, que sous les Harcourt Centre, Harcourt St. | feux, la verite est masquee 01-4170100 | Viens, bascule de notre côte, obscur
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu 06 Feb 2003 - 13:06:17 GMT