Re: [ILUG] 2.3 kernel

From: Martin Donlon (akawaka at domain csn.ul.ie)
Date: Wed 31 May 2000 - 15:38:15 IST

Next message: Colin Whittaker: "[ILUG] io errors"
Previous message: adam beecher: "RE: [ILUG] Apache and looping routines"
In reply to: John P. Looney (Kate): "Re: [ILUG] 2.3 kernel"
Next in thread: Justin Mason: "Re: [ILUG] 2.3 kernel"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On Mon, 22 May 2000, John P. Looney (Kate) wrote:

> > pre7 is horrible. pre8 is dreadful. pre9-2 is ok. pre9-3 is horrible
> > again.
> >
> > so pre9-2 is the one to go for.
>
> Mutter. What are they doing ?
>
> Kate, getting sick of nVidia's drivers - even after removing them, the X
> server doesn't come out of power saving, once it goes in...
Well, serves you right for using them, doesn't it?:)

Martin

--
Bother! said Pooh, as  at domain F wrought terrible revenge upon him.

Next message: Colin Whittaker: "[ILUG] io errors"
Previous message: adam beecher: "RE: [ILUG] Apache and looping routines"
In reply to: John P. Looney (Kate): "Re: [ILUG] 2.3 kernel"
Next in thread: Justin Mason: "Re: [ILUG] 2.3 kernel"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu 06 Feb 2003 - 13:06:19 GMT