RE: [ILUG] Re: Realplayer wants libstdc++2.8

From: Paul Jakma (Paul.Jakma at domain Digital.com)
Date: Fri 21 May 1999 - 15:22:44 IST

• Next message: John McDonnell: "[ILUG] Dublin F2F?"
• Previous message: John McDonnell: "[ILUG] [OT-ish] Reasonable PII MoBo's"
• Maybe in reply to: John Hegarty: "[ILUG] Re: Realplayer wants libstdc++2.8"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

> >
> If you have libstdc++2.9, then I think the link command ought to be:-
>
> ln -s /usr/lib/libstdc++2.9 /usr/lib/libstdc++2.8
>
shouldn't there be a .so in there? ie:

ln -s /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.2.9 /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.2.8

i had this with some other programme, and i think 2.9 and 2.8 aren't binary
compatible. I have 2.9, 2.8 and 2.7 installed cause they're all not
compatible with each other.

• Next message: John McDonnell: "[ILUG] Dublin F2F?"
• Previous message: John McDonnell: "[ILUG] [OT-ish] Reasonable PII MoBo's"
• Maybe in reply to: John Hegarty: "[ILUG] Re: Realplayer wants libstdc++2.8"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu 06 Feb 2003 - 13:04:13 GMT