Re: [ILUG] mutt, gpg and pine

From: Lars Hecking (lhecking at domain nmrc.ie)
Date: Tue 04 Jul 2000 - 17:33:20 IST

• Next message: David Neary: "Re: [ILUG] [OT] [Fwd: Unix/Linux support for Sorenson codec]"
• Previous message: kevin lyda: "Re: [ILUG] [OT] [Fwd: Unix/Linux support for Sorenson codec]"
• In reply to: Paul Jakma: "Re: [ILUG] mutt, gpg and pine"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

> very nice of mutt to slap content-type headers on everything, but why does
> it use "Content-type: application/octet-stream" for the actual encrypted
> data? the "Content-type: application/pgp-encrypted" attachment is there
> too, but just seems to have "v1.0" in it.
>
> weird...
 
 Oops, I meant to reply to the list ...

 RFC 1847 Section 2.2. RFC 2015 Section 4.

• Next message: David Neary: "Re: [ILUG] [OT] [Fwd: Unix/Linux support for Sorenson codec]"
• Previous message: kevin lyda: "Re: [ILUG] [OT] [Fwd: Unix/Linux support for Sorenson codec]"
• In reply to: Paul Jakma: "Re: [ILUG] mutt, gpg and pine"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu 06 Feb 2003 - 13:06:47 GMT