Re: [ILUG] samba, win98 and win95 clients

From: Donncha O Caoimh (donncha.ocaoimh at domain tradesignals.com)
Date: Fri 07 Jul 2000 - 12:41:39 IST


Kenn Humborg wrote:
>
> > ho hum, NT box works for 2 years fine, then this morning refuses to
[snip]
> > don't provide any simple example.
>
> Do you still have a functioning Domain Controller? If so, make
> the Samba box a member of the domain and use security = domain.
> Samba won't have to do any password checking then, so you won't
> need to worry about encrypted/non-encrypted passwords.
>
> I think... Works for me anyway.

All I know about the wonders of SMB I know from the Samba docs so I'm
not sure exactly what our NT box was/is. All I know was that the Samba
boxes reported it as the "current master browser" and everything worked
ok once you told the win9x clients to look at our local domain for
password auth. (so I guess the NT box was a domain controller)
All the Linux boxes were authenticating off the NT box(security-server)
and Samba was able to see the NT box but the Windows boxes weren't so
the Linux boxes recognising the NT server was pretty useless.. :)

I really don't fancy hacking the registry to force plaintext password :(

Donncha.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu 06 Feb 2003 - 13:06:49 GMT