RE: [ILUG] etrn

From: Kenn Humborg (kenn at domain bluetree.ie)
Date: Fri 07 Jul 2000 - 18:07:06 IST


> I was going to get around to including why UUCP wasn't used any
> more. It's
> a long story, but basically revolves around four things:
>
> 1) crappy implementations
...
> 2) crappy tuning
...
> 3) Mickeysoft don't support it.
...
> 4) Most people don't know that you can run UUCP over TCP.
...
> Faced with these marketing issues, the choice was clear: use the inferior
> protocol.

So any techo-political activists around here want to take on
this challenge?

Go UUCP, GO!

Later,
Kenn



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu 06 Feb 2003 - 13:06:49 GMT