From: Alan Sobey (ags-lists at domain esatclear.ie)
Date: Wed 12 Jul 2000 - 09:26:41 IST
On Wed, Jul 12, 2000 at 04:25:54AM +0100, Paul Jakma wrote:
> or use a good mp3 encoder in the first place. Someone mentioned that
> Lame 3.8x is huge improvement over Lame 3.5x (which was already far
> ahead of the other free encoders). Tried it this eve (upgrade from
> 3.5x), and it is really really good.
I tried using lame a few days ago and unfortunately got seg faults
while encoding some of the songs. I tried 3.85 (beta) and 3.70
(stable) and the only way I got the whole cd to encode was by varying
the quality (between 160 and 192) and by varying CBR/VBR. Has anyone
had similar experiences? I presume this isn't normal.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu 06 Feb 2003 - 13:06:51 GMT