Re: [ILUG] X speed tip

From: kevin lyda (kevin at domain suberic.net)
Date: Mon 24 Jul 2000 - 10:42:20 IST

• Next message: Donncha O Caoimh: "[ILUG] movies on linux"
• Previous message: Petko Alov: "Re: [ILUG] Not so smart host :-)"
• In reply to: C. Hennessy: "Re: [ILUG] X speed tip"
• Next in thread: Martin Donlon: "Re: [ILUG] X speed tip"
• Reply: Martin Donlon: "Re: [ILUG] X speed tip"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On Mon, Jul 24, 2000 at 10:18:44AM +0100, C. Hennessy wrote:
> Martin Donlon wrote:
> > Why?
> Because you give X more CPU time. [ AKA higher scheduling priority ]
> RTFM at
> $ man nice
> and
> $ man renice

another way to speed up x (assumes a fast network - 10mb+) is to run
the wm on a seperate machine.

kevin

-- 
kevin at domain suberic.net       "there's nothing wrong with windows 2000 that
fork()'ed on 37058400    linux can't fix."  -- va linux t-shirt
meatspace place: work    

• Next message: Donncha O Caoimh: "[ILUG] movies on linux"
• Previous message: Petko Alov: "Re: [ILUG] Not so smart host :-)"
• In reply to: C. Hennessy: "Re: [ILUG] X speed tip"
• Next in thread: Martin Donlon: "Re: [ILUG] X speed tip"
• Reply: Martin Donlon: "Re: [ILUG] X speed tip"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu 06 Feb 2003 - 13:06:57 GMT