Re: [ILUG] mutt and gpg

From: Kenn Humborg (kenn at domain linux.ie)
Date: Wed 26 Jul 2000 - 00:36:04 IST


On Tue, Jul 25, 2000 at 10:24:47PM +0100, kevin lyda wrote:
> c'mon i've got a 4096 bit key to drive various security agencies
> computers nuts with (8 years later, "oh look he's letting his friend
> know that he paid for the plant. that's gotta be a code for something,
> he wouldn't have a 4k key for that!"). i want to drive them nuts, not
> my friends i'm sending mail to!

Hey - have some consideration for those of us with older computers
(and I don't mean my VAXen...) It takes a good fraction of a
second for me to check the signature on your emails (and that's
only to get as far as gpg saying "you don't have this guy's
public key", never mind the actual decryption/hashing bit) on
my P133...

I really must buy a new machine... Now, should I get one
fast CPU or two slower ones. Liam? (hint, hint :-)

Later,
Kenn



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu 06 Feb 2003 - 13:06:59 GMT