Re: [ILUG] apt-cdrom q

From: Nick Moffitt (nick at domain zork.net)
Date: Tue 20 Mar 2001 - 18:36:59 GMT

Next message: Martin Donlon: "Re: [ILUG] mutt & imap & sent"
Previous message: Nick Moffitt: "Re: [ILUG] apt-cdrom q"
In reply to: Breathnach, Proinnsias (Dublin): "RE: [ILUG] apt-cdrom q"
Next in thread: Justin Mason: "Re: [ILUG] apt-cdrom q"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

begin Breathnach, Proinnsias (Dublin) quotation:
> You are entitled to your opinions, but please state that they are as
> such, yours.

You, sir, are NOT entitled to yours.

-- 
You are not entitled to your opinions.
 
	01234567 <- The amazing indent-o-meter!
        ^	    Matt McIrvin: the Nikola Tesla of tab damage.

Next message: Martin Donlon: "Re: [ILUG] mutt & imap & sent"
Previous message: Nick Moffitt: "Re: [ILUG] apt-cdrom q"
In reply to: Breathnach, Proinnsias (Dublin): "RE: [ILUG] apt-cdrom q"
Next in thread: Justin Mason: "Re: [ILUG] apt-cdrom q"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu 06 Feb 2003 - 13:09:27 GMT