Re: [ILUG] No Limits ? - No Service !

From: Paul J Collins (sneakums at domain zork.net)
Date: Tue 01 May 2001 - 10:37:04 IST

• Next message: Jerry Walsh: "Re: [ILUG] No Limits ? - No Service !"
• Previous message: Keith Clancy: "RE: [ILUG] No Limits ? - No Service !"
• In reply to: Keith Clancy: "RE: [ILUG] No Limits ? - No Service !"
• Next in thread: Jerry Walsh: "Re: [ILUG] No Limits ? - No Service !"
• Reply: Jerry Walsh: "Re: [ILUG] No Limits ? - No Service !"
• Reply: Gerard J Keating: "Re: [ILUG] No Limits ? - No Service !"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

>>>>> "KC" == Keith Clancy <Keith.Clancy at domain Berlitz.ie> writes:

    KC> no ... 100hz wrecks my head and i watch tv standing on my head

You must be in of those sooper-sekrit HDTV trial areas. My old PAL TV
set only does 50 fields per second, giving 25 frames per second.

-- 
 /////////////////  |                  | The spark of a pin
<sneakums at domain zork.net> |   left blank.    | dropping, falling feather-like.
 \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\  |                  | There is too much noise.

• Next message: Jerry Walsh: "Re: [ILUG] No Limits ? - No Service !"
• Previous message: Keith Clancy: "RE: [ILUG] No Limits ? - No Service !"
• In reply to: Keith Clancy: "RE: [ILUG] No Limits ? - No Service !"
• Next in thread: Jerry Walsh: "Re: [ILUG] No Limits ? - No Service !"
• Reply: Jerry Walsh: "Re: [ILUG] No Limits ? - No Service !"
• Reply: Gerard J Keating: "Re: [ILUG] No Limits ? - No Service !"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu 06 Feb 2003 - 13:10:08 GMT