Television (was Re: [ILUG] No Limits ? - No Service !)

From: Paul J Collins (sneakums at domain zork.net)
Date: Tue 01 May 2001 - 12:07:05 IST

Next message: Jerry Walsh: "Re: [ILUG] Tv Standards (Was: No Limits ? - No Service !)"
Previous message: Stephane Dudzinski: "Re: [ILUG] Overclocking"
In reply to: Gerard J Keating: "Re: [ILUG] No Limits ? - No Service !"
Next in thread: HAMILTON,DAVID (HP-Ireland,ex2): "RE: Television (was Re: [ILUG] No Limits ? - No Service !)"
Maybe reply: HAMILTON,DAVID (HP-Ireland,ex2): "RE: Television (was Re: [ILUG] No Limits ? - No Service !)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

>>>>> "GJK" == Gerard J Keating <gerard.keating at domain fintrax.com> writes:

GJK> Paul J Collins wrote:
>> You must be in of those sooper-sekrit HDTV trial areas. My old
>> PAL TV set only does 50 fields per second, giving 25 frames per
>> second.

GJK> A lot of high-end PAL TV's are 100hz now. They claim is gives
GJK> a more stable picture...

A PAL signal is never 100Hz. These TVs are just showing each field
twice.

-- 
 /////////////////  |                  | The spark of a pin
<sneakums at domain zork.net> |   left blank.    | dropping, falling feather-like.
 \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\  |                  | There is too much noise.

Next message: Jerry Walsh: "Re: [ILUG] Tv Standards (Was: No Limits ? - No Service !)"
Previous message: Stephane Dudzinski: "Re: [ILUG] Overclocking"
In reply to: Gerard J Keating: "Re: [ILUG] No Limits ? - No Service !"
Next in thread: HAMILTON,DAVID (HP-Ireland,ex2): "RE: Television (was Re: [ILUG] No Limits ? - No Service !)"
Maybe reply: HAMILTON,DAVID (HP-Ireland,ex2): "RE: Television (was Re: [ILUG] No Limits ? - No Service !)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu 06 Feb 2003 - 13:10:08 GMT