From: Conor Daly (conor.daly at domain met.ie)
Date: Thu 03 May 2001 - 11:36:22 IST
On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 11:13:49AM +0100 or thereabouts, kevin lyda wrote:
> On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 10:04:48AM +0000, Conor Daly wrote:
> > Got a user here who's used to using <ESC> for filename completion. He's now
> > come up against <TAB> for all the completion stuff in bash. He was thinking
> > he'd like to have <ESC> do what <TAB> does. I thought initially of xmodmap
> > but that could get upsetting in vi and stuff. Had a look at the man page
> > for bash and got no help there. Anyway, the question is, Is there a way to
> > have <TAB> functionality transferred to <ESC> without losing <ESC>
> > functionality?
>
> what does adding
>
> ESC: complete
>
> do when you add it to your ~/.inputrc? search for inputrc in the bash
> man page for more info.
Yup, that does it. Must read more. BTW, a double-ESC already does this.
Is there something that a single ESC does that I've wiped out by mapping to
"complete"?
Conor
-- Conor Daly Met Eireann, Glasnevin Hill, Dublin 9, Ireland Ph +353 1 8064217 Fax +353 1 8064275 ------------------------------------ 10:35am up 23 days, 19:45, 11 users, load average: 1.03, 1.01, 1.00
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu 06 Feb 2003 - 13:10:10 GMT