Re: [ILUG] ximian gnome 1.4, first impressions...

From: Stephane Dudzinski (stephane at domain antefacto.com)
Date: Tue 08 May 2001 - 12:54:13 IST

• Next message: Thomas Bridge: "[ILUG] Alternatives to Windows"
• Previous message: Smelly Pooh: "Re: [ILUG] ximian gnome 1.4, first impressions..."
• In reply to: Smelly Pooh: "Re: [ILUG] ximian gnome 1.4, first impressions..."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Performances on KDE 2.1.1 are now acceptable and Kmail does not crash
anymore on multiple attachements, getting there mate.

On 08 May 2001 12:50:20 +0100, Smelly Pooh wrote:
> In reply to kevin lyda's flatulent wordings,
> > ok, snarfed ximian gnome this weekend. first i'll cover bad things.
> > i see these so far:
>
> Anybody here use KDE 2.1(beta)? I usually switch from KDE to GNOME to KDE
> whenever a new version of either comes out and I've always considered KDE to
> be the better put together desktop, especially using konqueror which seems
> much faster and more stable than mozilla
>
> --
> Irish Linux Users' Group: ilug at domain linux.ie
> http://www.linux.ie/mailman/listinfo/ilug for (un)subscription information.
> List maintainer: listmaster at domain linux.ie

-- 
Email sent with Redhat 7.1 kernel 244ac2 reiserfs
"Never underestimate the true power of ChAoS"
Mailto:stephane at domain antefacto.com
Ph : +353 1 858 6009

• Next message: Thomas Bridge: "[ILUG] Alternatives to Windows"
• Previous message: Smelly Pooh: "Re: [ILUG] ximian gnome 1.4, first impressions..."
• In reply to: Smelly Pooh: "Re: [ILUG] ximian gnome 1.4, first impressions..."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu 06 Feb 2003 - 13:10:13 GMT