Re: [ILUG] hdparm and DMA "not permitted"

From: Conor Daly (conor.daly at domain oceanfree.net)
Date: Sun 20 May 2001 - 18:22:40 IST

Next message: Paul Kelly: "Re: [ILUG] [OT] Lottery Homepage hacked."
Previous message: Conor Daly: "Re: [ILUG] hdparm and DMA "not permitted""
In reply to: John McCormac: "Re: [ILUG] hdparm and DMA "not permitted""
Next in thread: James Sutherland: "[ILUG] Re: [techtalk] hdparm and DMA "not permitted""
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On Sun, May 20, 2001 at 01:14:15PM +0100 or so it is rumoured hereabouts,
John McCormac thought:
> Vincent Cunniffe wrote:
> >
> > > hda: Maxtor 91021U2, ATA DISK drive
> > > hdb: FUJITSU MPD3084AT, ATA DISK drive
>
> If the HD is a UDMA66/33 and there is a non-UDMA66/33 device on the same
> chain it can cause problems. The best thing would be to keep the UDMA
> devices on IDE0 and the non UDMA devices on IDE1.

And how can I tell if they're UDMA66/33?

Conor

-- 
Conor Daly <conor.daly at domain oceanfree.net>
Domestic Sysadmin :-)
---------------------
Faenor.cod.ie
  6:19pm  up 1 day,  6:27,  0 users,  load average: 0.08, 0.09, 0.05
Hobbiton.cod.ie
  6:18pm  up  7:19,  1 user,  load average: 0.07, 0.08, 0.03

Next message: Paul Kelly: "Re: [ILUG] [OT] Lottery Homepage hacked."
Previous message: Conor Daly: "Re: [ILUG] hdparm and DMA "not permitted""
In reply to: John McCormac: "Re: [ILUG] hdparm and DMA "not permitted""
Next in thread: James Sutherland: "[ILUG] Re: [techtalk] hdparm and DMA "not permitted""
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu 06 Feb 2003 - 13:10:23 GMT