Re: [ILUG] Postfix and pop before smtp

From: Nick Murtagh (murtaghn at domain tcd.ie)
Date: Tue 22 May 2001 - 18:14:18 IST

Next message: Conor Daly: "Re: [ILUG] hdparm and DMA "not permitted""
Previous message: John P. Looney: "Re: [ILUG] alternatives to exchange??"
In reply to: Nick Murtagh: "Re: [ILUG] Postfix and pop before smtp"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 06:08:33PM +0100, Nick Murtagh wrote:
> I had pop-before-smtp working with teapop and sendmail, but it wasn't
> 100% and I gave it up for POP AUTH instead (which postfix supports).

Obviously that idiot means SMTP AUTH :)

Next message: Conor Daly: "Re: [ILUG] hdparm and DMA "not permitted""
Previous message: John P. Looney: "Re: [ILUG] alternatives to exchange??"
In reply to: Nick Murtagh: "Re: [ILUG] Postfix and pop before smtp"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu 06 Feb 2003 - 13:10:25 GMT