Re: [ILUG] Bourne Shell Q

From: Dave Airlie (airlied at domain csn.ul.ie)
Date: Tue 12 Jun 2001 - 18:31:41 IST

Next message: Stephen_Reilly at domain dell.com: "[ILUG] Nethack -- Falcon's Eye"
Previous message: Colm Buckley: "Re: [ILUG] Bourne Shell Q"
In reply to: Colm Buckley: "Re: [ILUG] Bourne Shell Q"
Next in thread: Stephen Shirley: "RE: [ILUG] Bourne Shell Q"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

my bash doesn't have it .. sure it's not a zshism ..

Dave.

On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Colm Buckley wrote:

> On Tuesday 12 June 2001 18:27, you wrote:
> > read -t3 response
> > if $response = "" then echo "non interactive" fi
>
> That's a bashism. I don't think bog-standard sh has it. But, if this
> is *Linux*, you're pretty much guaranteed to have bash, so...
>
> Colm
>
>

-- 
David Airlie, Software Engineer
http://www.skynet.ie/~airlied / airlied at domain skynet.ie
pam_smb / Linux DecStation / Linux VAX / ILUG person

Next message: Stephen_Reilly at domain dell.com: "[ILUG] Nethack -- Falcon's Eye"
Previous message: Colm Buckley: "Re: [ILUG] Bourne Shell Q"
In reply to: Colm Buckley: "Re: [ILUG] Bourne Shell Q"
Next in thread: Stephen Shirley: "RE: [ILUG] Bourne Shell Q"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu 06 Feb 2003 - 13:10:38 GMT