Re: [ILUG] gcc libs question

From: Dave Neary (dave.neary at domain palamon.ie)
Date: Mon 18 Jun 2001 - 16:17:53 IST

Next message: Fergal Daly: "Re: [ILUG] Encryption / Security"
Previous message: Keith Clancy: "RE: [ILUG] Re: [TechnoBabble] Encryption / Security"
In reply to: Chris Higgins : "Re: [ILUG] gcc libs question"
Next in thread: Liam Bedford: "Re: [ILUG] gcc libs question"
Reply: Liam Bedford: "Re: [ILUG] gcc libs question"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

"Kate " wrote:

> > Why can't the GNU project just accept that info failed, because the info
> > browser is crap and unusable, get over it, and keep decent manpages again ?
texi2html may well be the answer to your prayers. I think the time might
well have come to distribute info pages as browsable html... with text
only, lynx would become my default documentation reader :)

Cheers,
Dave.

-- 
David Neary,               E-Mail dave.neary at domain palamon.ie
Palamon Technologies Ltd.  Phone +353-1-634-5059

Next message: Fergal Daly: "Re: [ILUG] Encryption / Security"
Previous message: Keith Clancy: "RE: [ILUG] Re: [TechnoBabble] Encryption / Security"
In reply to: Chris Higgins : "Re: [ILUG] gcc libs question"
Next in thread: Liam Bedford: "Re: [ILUG] gcc libs question"
Reply: Liam Bedford: "Re: [ILUG] gcc libs question"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu 06 Feb 2003 - 13:10:43 GMT