Re: SV: [ILUG] Yes, Ransom Love IS a parasite.

From: kevin lyda (kevin at domain suberic.net)
Date: Thu 28 Jun 2001 - 00:25:39 IST

Next message: Paul Jakma: "Re: [ILUG] More ass saving with the BBC"
Previous message: Peter Kjeldsen: "SV: [ILUG] Yes, Ransom Love IS a parasite."
In reply to: Peter Kjeldsen: "SV: [ILUG] Yes, Ransom Love IS a parasite."
Next in thread: Wesley Darlington: "Re: SV: [ILUG] Yes, Ransom Love IS a parasite."
Reply: Wesley Darlington: "Re: SV: [ILUG] Yes, Ransom Love IS a parasite."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 11:40:20PM +0200, Peter Kjeldsen wrote:
> This is exactly what I promised my boss wouldn't happen, so I guess it is
> back to Red Hat...

there's an additional lesson here: if a linux vendor does customer
unfriendly things, then the user has a relatively painless choice -
a different linux distro.

kevin

-- 
kevin at domain suberic.net          "linux is a cancer"  --steve ballmer
fork()'ed on 37058400      "released 25 august 1991, linux is a virgo" --me
meatspace place: home       linux, not just a star-sign:
http://suberic.net/~kevin                             http://www.linux.com/

Next message: Paul Jakma: "Re: [ILUG] More ass saving with the BBC"
Previous message: Peter Kjeldsen: "SV: [ILUG] Yes, Ransom Love IS a parasite."
In reply to: Peter Kjeldsen: "SV: [ILUG] Yes, Ransom Love IS a parasite."
Next in thread: Wesley Darlington: "Re: SV: [ILUG] Yes, Ransom Love IS a parasite."
Reply: Wesley Darlington: "Re: SV: [ILUG] Yes, Ransom Love IS a parasite."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu 06 Feb 2003 - 13:10:53 GMT