Re: [ILUG] [Slightly OT] TCP / M$

From: Wesley Darlington (wesley at domain yelsew.com)
Date: Fri 10 Aug 2001 - 13:57:09 IST

Next message: Chris Higgins: "Re: [ILUG] [OT] Cascading switches"
Previous message: Wesley Darlington: "Re: [ILUG] [OT] Cascading switches"
In reply to: Paul McCourt: "[ILUG] [Slightly OT] TCP / M$"
Next in thread: Wynne, Conor: "RE: [ILUG] [Slightly OT] TCP / M$"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On Fri, Aug 10, 2001 at 10:39:40AM +0000, Paul McCourt wrote:
> Bad name though, I agree.

Yeah, that's pretty much the only problem I have with it. It is vendor
neutral in theory, which makes me happy - it's just microsoft specific
in practice. But that darned name - aiee!

Thanks,
Wesley.

Next message: Chris Higgins: "Re: [ILUG] [OT] Cascading switches"
Previous message: Wesley Darlington: "Re: [ILUG] [OT] Cascading switches"
In reply to: Paul McCourt: "[ILUG] [Slightly OT] TCP / M$"
Next in thread: Wynne, Conor: "RE: [ILUG] [Slightly OT] TCP / M$"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu 06 Feb 2003 - 13:11:33 GMT