Re: [ILUG] Slackware question

From: ivannet at domain eirnetwebdesign.com
Date: Mon 13 Aug 2001 - 15:07:15 IST

• Next message: Niall O Broin: "Re: [ILUG] [OT] Cascading switches"
• Previous message: John P. Looney: "Re: [ILUG] [OT] Cascading switches"
• In reply to: RYAN, SHANE(DUBLIN): "[ILUG] Slackware question"
• Next in thread: Andrew: "Re: [ILUG] Slackware question"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

is it not that gnome do not support slackware. AFAIK there are gnome 1.4 tgz's in the current branch on slackware's FTP server.

regards
ivan
On Mon, Aug 13, 2001 at 11:00:00AM +0100, RYAN, SHANE(DUBLIN) wrote:
> hi all,
>
> Just wondering, why is it that Slackware 7.1
> does not support Gnome 1.4 or KDE 2.x?
>
> Is this something to do with the version of
> xfree86 is uses? (3.3.6) or is it something
> entirely different?
>
> any info is appreciated, please cc all mails
> to me as I'm not subscribed with this email
> addy.
>
> thanks,
> Shane.
>
> --
> http://blackflame.8m.com/
> - Bringing a new meaning to the word *lazy* -

• Next message: Niall O Broin: "Re: [ILUG] [OT] Cascading switches"
• Previous message: John P. Looney: "Re: [ILUG] [OT] Cascading switches"
• In reply to: RYAN, SHANE(DUBLIN): "[ILUG] Slackware question"
• Next in thread: Andrew: "Re: [ILUG] Slackware question"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu 06 Feb 2003 - 13:11:35 GMT