[ILUG] re :smoothwall

From: Nils Olofsson (nils at domain eircom.net)
Date: Tue 14 Aug 2001 - 23:31:10 IST


>Subject:

[ILUG] Smoothwall + squid + samba
>From:

"JustinMacCarthy" <macarthy at domain iol.ie>
>Date:

Tue, 14 Aug 2001 11:17:15 +0100

>To:

<ilug at domain linux.ie>

>I was thinking of building a Smoothwall + squid + samba , I want some
>network storage accessable from Win2000 / WinNT / Linux boxes with will
>serve as the internet connection of my network

>Here are my questions:

>1. Will putting squid + samba on the box defeat the purpose of smoothwall in
>the first instance ??
>2. Will a p166 96mb of ram be powerful enough
>3. Is the cache tha comes with smoothwall squid (or as good as ) ?
>4. Other things to look out for?

>TIA

>Justin

hi,
1. Smoothwall is a custom build kernel and i it does no come with samba and it would be classed as a security risk to but it on.Also it does not come with the tools to compile software(the download is only 22mb ver 0.8.9).

2 .I Set up Smoothwall on a 486 with 12mb ram and it ran ok,because the access was only isdn and there was only 12 computer accessing the computer at any one time. I supect that if the user grow to 20 -50 users,I would need to upgrade the machine to a pentium.

3. Smoothwall will act as a gateway and proxy server and i never had any problems with it. That is what it was designed for.

4. configuring external isdn TA's is a bitch.. excuse the language but i think
that it is sorted out in ver 0.9.9 .

Nils



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu 06 Feb 2003 - 13:11:38 GMT