Re: [ILUG] Is Apache on Windozs also vulnerable to worms?

From: Dave O Connor (doc at domain redbrick.dcu.ie)
Date: Thu 16 Aug 2001 - 16:23:24 IST

Next message: jac1: "RE: [ILUG] [OT] Membership"
Previous message: David Golden: "Re: [ILUG] Urgent question re mouseless Gnome or KDE"
In reply to: Wynne, Conor: "[ILUG] Is Apache on Windozs also vulnerable to worms?"
Next in thread: bscanlan at domain irish-times.com: "Re: [ILUG] Is Apache on Windozs also vulnerable to worms?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Wynne, Conor said on Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 04:10:32PM +0100:
> Hi Guys,
>
> Windows sucks, but....
>
> Is Apache on Windozs also vulnerable to worms?
>
Not that I know of. The worms flying about these days affect IIS.

> p.s.: Windozs sucks. I hate it. I really don't like posting this question,
> but I need the answer quick.
> Again, apologies coz windows sucks.
>
No need to apologise. I usually ignore this kind of wooly "m$ sux" twaddle at a
subconscious level, anyway.

- DoC

-- 
 I know I believe in nothing,  | <doc at redbrick.dcu.ie>
  ...but it is my nothing.     |

Next message: jac1: "RE: [ILUG] [OT] Membership"
Previous message: David Golden: "Re: [ILUG] Urgent question re mouseless Gnome or KDE"
In reply to: Wynne, Conor: "[ILUG] Is Apache on Windozs also vulnerable to worms?"
Next in thread: bscanlan at domain irish-times.com: "Re: [ILUG] Is Apache on Windozs also vulnerable to worms?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu 06 Feb 2003 - 13:11:42 GMT