Re: [ILUG] Is Apache on Windozs also vulnerable to worms?

From: bscanlan at domain irish-times.com
Date: Thu 16 Aug 2001 - 16:29:52 IST

• Next message: Matthew French: "Re: [ILUG] Is Apache on Windozs also vulnerable to worms?"
• Previous message: jac1: "RE: [ILUG] [OT] Membership"
• In reply to: Wynne, Conor: "[ILUG] Is Apache on Windozs also vulnerable to worms?"
• Next in thread: Matthew French: "Re: [ILUG] Is Apache on Windozs also vulnerable to worms?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 04:10:32PM +0100, Wynne, Conor wrote:
>
> Is Apache on Windows also vulnerable to worms?

Apache != IIS.

Brian.

-- 
Brian Scanlan, Systems Administrator.
Irish Times New Media - http://www.ireland.com

• Next message: Matthew French: "Re: [ILUG] Is Apache on Windozs also vulnerable to worms?"
• Previous message: jac1: "RE: [ILUG] [OT] Membership"
• In reply to: Wynne, Conor: "[ILUG] Is Apache on Windozs also vulnerable to worms?"
• Next in thread: Matthew French: "Re: [ILUG] Is Apache on Windozs also vulnerable to worms?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu 06 Feb 2003 - 13:11:42 GMT