Re: [ILUG] Is Apache on Windozs also vulnerable to worms?

From: Wesley Darlington (wesley at domain yelsew.com)
Date: Fri 17 Aug 2001 - 09:55:09 IST

Next message: Conor Daly: "Re: [ILUG] Good News and Bad news..."
Previous message: Conor Daly: "Re: [ILUG] RH newbie question :-)"
In reply to: Matthew French: "Re: [ILUG] Is Apache on Windozs also vulnerable to worms?"
Next in thread: Matthew French: "Re: [ILUG] Is Apache on Windozs also vulnerable to worms?"
Reply: Matthew French: "Re: [ILUG] Is Apache on Windozs also vulnerable to worms?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 04:43:01PM +0100, Matthew French wrote:
> IIRC the Lion and Ramen worms were Apache specific.

Methinks you recall incorrectly.

Wesley.

Next message: Conor Daly: "Re: [ILUG] Good News and Bad news..."
Previous message: Conor Daly: "Re: [ILUG] RH newbie question :-)"
In reply to: Matthew French: "Re: [ILUG] Is Apache on Windozs also vulnerable to worms?"
Next in thread: Matthew French: "Re: [ILUG] Is Apache on Windozs also vulnerable to worms?"
Reply: Matthew French: "Re: [ILUG] Is Apache on Windozs also vulnerable to worms?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu 06 Feb 2003 - 13:11:42 GMT