Re: [ILUG] Is Apache on Windozs also vulnerable to worms?

From: Matthew French (mfrench42 at domain yahoo.co.uk)
Date: Fri 17 Aug 2001 - 11:23:00 IST

Next message: hrishy: "[ILUG] striping file from blank lines"
Previous message: Wesley Darlington: "Re: [ILUG] wierd performance problems...solved"
In reply to: Wesley Darlington: "Re: [ILUG] Is Apache on Windozs also vulnerable to worms?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On Fri, Aug 17, 2001 at 04:55:05AM -0400, Wesley Darlington wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 04:43:01PM +0100, Matthew French wrote:
> > IIRC the Lion and Ramen worms were Apache specific.
>
> Methinks you recall incorrectly.

Doh!!! I stand corrected. Ramen exploited "rpc.statd, wuftpd, and
LPRng". Lion worked in a similar fashion.

They were Linux worms. If I had been thinking clearly I might have
noticed the subtle distinction that Linux != Apache... :(

- Matthew

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free at domain yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

Next message: hrishy: "[ILUG] striping file from blank lines"
Previous message: Wesley Darlington: "Re: [ILUG] wierd performance problems...solved"
In reply to: Wesley Darlington: "Re: [ILUG] Is Apache on Windozs also vulnerable to worms?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu 06 Feb 2003 - 13:11:43 GMT