Re: [ILUG] funny attack (comes in threes)

From: kevin lyda (kevin at domain suberic.net)
Date: Tue 21 Aug 2001 - 11:57:43 IST

Next message: Rick Moen: "Re: Rootkits was [Re: [ILUG] pam problem]"
Previous message: Paul Jakma: "Re: [ILUG] funny attack (comes in threes)"
In reply to: Paul Jakma: "Re: [ILUG] funny attack (comes in threes)"
Next in thread: Paul Jakma: "Re: [ILUG] funny attack (comes in threes)"
Reply: Paul Jakma: "Re: [ILUG] funny attack (comes in threes)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 11:03:23AM +0100, Paul Jakma wrote:
> the problem is PCs with routable IPs. problem is lack of IPs.

actually the last i was paying any attention, the problem wasn't a
shortage of ip's (or at least it wasn't a major issue). it was routing
table sizes on backbone routers.

kevin

-- 
kevin at domain suberic.net          simple four line sigs -
fork()'ed on 37058400      bandwidth friendly; nice to do.
meatspace place: home      some admins clueless.
http://suberic.net/~kevin          --netiquette haiku 2001

Next message: Rick Moen: "Re: Rootkits was [Re: [ILUG] pam problem]"
Previous message: Paul Jakma: "Re: [ILUG] funny attack (comes in threes)"
In reply to: Paul Jakma: "Re: [ILUG] funny attack (comes in threes)"
Next in thread: Paul Jakma: "Re: [ILUG] funny attack (comes in threes)"
Reply: Paul Jakma: "Re: [ILUG] funny attack (comes in threes)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu 06 Feb 2003 - 13:11:45 GMT