From: kevin lyda (kevin at domain suberic.net)
Date: Tue 28 Aug 2001 - 14:21:58 IST
summary (in speed order):
ext2 < jfs < xfs < ext3 < reiserfs
it really looks like ext3 will win out in the end however for home
user boxes. for newer servers, jfs looks best. on further thought
though it would seem like the following fs layout would be best:
/usr ext2 (optionally in ro mode)
app specific dirs (/var/lib/mysql, /var/www, etc) should be ext3/jfs
filesystems. in the short term ext3 looks favorable even for new systems
since pretty much every emergency boot disk can get at ext3 partitions
(in ext2 mode).
ok, thoughts, flames, etc...
-- kevin at domain suberic.net simple four line sigs - fork()'ed on 37058400 bandwidth friendly; nice to do. meatspace place: home some admins clueless. http://suberic.net/~kevin --netiquette haiku 2001
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu 06 Feb 2003 - 13:11:51 GMT