Re: [ILUG] BaSh or perl scripting q

From: Ronan Waide (waider at domain waider.ie)
Date: Fri 31 Aug 2001 - 11:52:32 IST

• Next message: Padraig Brady: "Re: [ILUG] BaSh or perl scripting q"
• Previous message: Nick: "Re: [ILUG] DNS and sendmail"
• In reply to: John P. Looney: "Re: [ILUG] BaSh or perl scripting q"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On August 31, john at domain antefacto.com said:
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 05:29:24PM +0100, Waider mentioned:
> > You might also want to add -q to stop grep spewing out whatever it
> > finds.
>
> Sweet. And here was me redirecting to dev null.
>
> Kate

As pointed out, this is, in fact, non-portable. It's a GNU feature, so
to speak.

Waider.

-- 
waider at domain waider.ie / Yes, it /is/ very personal of me.
"What is this talk of "release?"  We do not make software "releases."  Our
 software "escapes" leaving a bloody trail of designers and quality assurance
 people in its wake." - MoncriefJM at domain gvl.esys.com

• Next message: Padraig Brady: "Re: [ILUG] BaSh or perl scripting q"
• Previous message: Nick: "Re: [ILUG] DNS and sendmail"
• In reply to: John P. Looney: "Re: [ILUG] BaSh or perl scripting q"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu 06 Feb 2003 - 13:11:55 GMT