From: Noel Carroll (Noel.Carroll at domain CardBase.com)
Date: Tue 11 Sep 2001 - 15:57:38 IST
I really hope there wasn't 50,000 people at work at the time. Thats just
way, way too fucked up. Anyway, why the WTC? I wouldn't have figured it to
be a centre or symbol of Americanism? The Pentagon and State dept. sure,
but not that. Aside from that, how do you coordinate something so big
without any US intelligence finding out? This is so bad, considering
George Bush Snr's little gulf war jaunt over Kuwait, one wonders what dubya
is going to do. I know his old man was a bit crazy, but dubya's mad as a
coot! Oh fuck!!!
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ross Lynch [mailto:kernel at domain esatclear.ie]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 3:09 PM
> To: Dale Dunlea; Donncha O Caoimh; ilug at domain linux.ie
> Subject: RE: [ILUG] [OT] FYI: Newsflash
> > Anything I've read just said that the
> > plane was "capable of carrying 100
> > people". That's more giving an indication
> > of the size of the plane and
> > the damage it can do rather than saying
> > that's how many people were on
> > it. It's quite possible that the planes
> > were empty when they were taken.
> > An attack like this doesn't use hostages
> > so what's the point in taking
> > any?
> Hmm. I dunno, about as much point as taking out the
> The 737 can carry 100, while the 767 can carry 269
> ross lynch | me at domain rosslynch.com | +353 (0)87 9683368
> Nicht auf dem Teppich, Mann!
> Irish Linux Users' Group: ilug at domain linux.ie
> http://www.linux.ie/mailman/listinfo/ilug for
> (un)subscription information.
> List maintainer: listmaster at domain linux.ie
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu 06 Feb 2003 - 13:12:05 GMT