Re: [ILUG] Re: hmm...

From: Rick Moen (rick at domain linuxmafia.com)
Date: Wed 12 Sep 2001 - 23:07:07 IST


begin Paul Jakma quotation:

> so the cockpit would effectively not be pressurised?

My goodness. That's a very bizarre misreading of what I said.

(1) I did not say impermeable. I just said "security door".

(2) If a complete cutoff _were_ deemed desirable, one might provide
the cockpit with a separate air supply.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu 06 Feb 2003 - 13:12:06 GMT