Re: [OT] RE: [ILUG] Re: hmm...

From: Paul Jakma (paulj at domain alphyra.ie)
Date: Thu 13 Sep 2001 - 09:47:25 IST

Next message: Mark Webb: "[ILUG] .ie Domain hosting (preferably UNIX based)"
Previous message: Eamonn Shinners: "Re: [OT] RE: [ILUG] Re: hmm..."
In reply to: Eamonn Shinners: "Re: [OT] RE: [ILUG] Re: hmm..."
Next in thread: kevin lyda: "Re: [OT] RE: [ILUG] Re: hmm..."
Reply: kevin lyda: "Re: [OT] RE: [ILUG] Re: hmm..."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

a perfect example of why MTA auto-tacked-disclaimers are bad. the
message is signed, the disclaimer breaks the signature, and i don't
see anything in the way of a message.

--paulj

On Thu, 13 Sep 2001, Eamonn Shinners wrote:

Next message: Mark Webb: "[ILUG] .ie Domain hosting (preferably UNIX based)"
Previous message: Eamonn Shinners: "Re: [OT] RE: [ILUG] Re: hmm..."
In reply to: Eamonn Shinners: "Re: [OT] RE: [ILUG] Re: hmm..."
Next in thread: kevin lyda: "Re: [OT] RE: [ILUG] Re: hmm..."
Reply: kevin lyda: "Re: [OT] RE: [ILUG] Re: hmm..."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu 06 Feb 2003 - 13:12:07 GMT