Re: [ILUG] Duron or Celeron?

From: John P. Looney (john at domain antefacto.com)
Date: Wed 19 Sep 2001 - 09:02:38 IST


On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 07:52:36PM +0100, Ronny B mentioned:
> I have yet to try Tuxracer, but I'm using the GIMP between coding
> sessions a lot now; nothing to complain about :)
> (I do have 256MB of memory, though - but I have yet to see it actually
> used)

 I scanned in an A4 image over the weekend, at a pretty high scan
resolution. Edited it in the gimp...and used so much memory, I wished I'd
had a gig of the stuff.

 I agree with the endorsement of the Duron - good chip, reasonably speed.
If you need that last bit of speed; the athlons are damn cheap at the
moment.

Kate

-- 
_______________________________________
John Looney             Chief Scientist
a n t e f a c t o     t: +353 1 8586004
www.antefacto.com     f: +353 1 8586014


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu 06 Feb 2003 - 13:12:11 GMT