Re: [ILUG] Too good to be true?

From: John McCormac (jmcc at domain hackwatch.com)
Date: Fri 19 Oct 2001 - 10:00:47 IST

• Next message: Niall O Broin: "Re: [ILUG] Re: ILUG digest, Vol 1 #2109 - 10 msgs"
• Previous message: Fergal Moran: "[ILUG] Too good to be true?"
• In reply to: Fergal Moran: "[ILUG] Too good to be true?"
• Next in thread: Baldwin_James at domain emc.com: "RE: [ILUG] Too good to be true?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On Fri, 19 Oct 2001, Fergal Moran wrote:

> Have a look at
>
> http://www.educom.ie/
>
> Offering 400/128K 2 way satellite bandwith for £125 a month - £632 setup and £299 installation - nationwide. Spoke to them on the phone just there and it IS static IP addresses and comes with a router so should be linux friendly but the operator clammed up when I asked about shared bandwith - but a brochure is on the way which will answer all my questions.
>

If the satellite IP connectivty is supplied by OnStar then you are SOL.
Onstar just pulled out of Europe according to theregister.co.uk.

Regards...jmcc

• Next message: Niall O Broin: "Re: [ILUG] Re: ILUG digest, Vol 1 #2109 - 10 msgs"
• Previous message: Fergal Moran: "[ILUG] Too good to be true?"
• In reply to: Fergal Moran: "[ILUG] Too good to be true?"
• Next in thread: Baldwin_James at domain emc.com: "RE: [ILUG] Too good to be true?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu 06 Feb 2003 - 13:12:49 GMT