From: Thomas Bridge (tbridge at domain vianetworks.ie)
Date: Thu 11 Apr 2002 - 15:42:18 IST
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
At 15:02 11/04/2002 +0100, Nick Murtagh wrote:
>And yes, there are broken caches out there. Also, aren't there minimum legal
>TTLs in the specs?
Nope.
Earlier versions of BIND and some resolvers had issues with low TTLS (like
0 if I recall correctly).
But software "features" don't always correspond to the RFC
requirements. Look at Exchange for proof :)
T.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
iQA/AwUBPLWgjr6WYZbx1eG3EQIPZgCgoTybP1JJS1IvGiEnhksRHZGBaWcAoKpw
WHNXVG6mVog7Ly9QMzMEUJP0
=m1+R
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu 06 Feb 2003 - 13:16:01 GMT