From: Nick Murtagh (murtaghn at domain tcd.ie)
Date: Thu 11 Apr 2002 - 15:46:14 IST
On Thursday 11 April 2002 15:41, Thomas Bridge wrote:
> At 15:02 11/04/2002 +0100, Nick Murtagh wrote:
> >And yes, there are broken caches out there. Also, aren't there minimum
> > legal TTLs in the specs?
>
> Nope.
>
> Earlier versions of BIND and some resolvers had issues with low TTLS (like
> 0 if I recall correctly).
Ah that's good to know, makes me feel better about the whole thing.
> But software "features" don't always correspond to the RFC
> requirements. Look at Exchange for proof :)
Virus Exchange? I've avoided looking at it so far :)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu 06 Feb 2003 - 13:16:01 GMT