Re: [ILUG] Dumb mutt question

From: Donal (redgiant+ilug at domain redbrick.dcu.ie)
Date: Mon 15 Apr 2002 - 17:45:30 IST


On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 03:41:45PM +0100, John P. Looney wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 03:34:20PM +0100, Mel mentioned:
> >
> > Warning: really dumb question :-(
> >
> > I used mutt for reading Linux-Kernel mail because of the threading
> > support. Thing is that I can't tab to the next new mail if I had just
> > opened and closed the mailbox earlier without reading the mails. It gets
> > flagged as O instead of N . How can I make it treat all "O" mails as "N"?
> > I thought it would be related to the access time but using utime to reset
> > it did nothing constructive and I can't see any equivilant to the tab key
> > for O mails either :-(
>
> set nomark_old # I don't care about whether a message is old

or:

bind index "&" next-unread
bind pager "&" next-unread

change "&" to whatever you want...
seems to work for me... though i did have the above set so i dunno...

D.

-- 


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu 06 Feb 2003 - 13:16:07 GMT