Re: [ILUG] D11, (again, i havn't given up)

From: Justin Mason (jm at domain netnoteinc.com)
Date: Mon 09 Aug 1999 - 12:06:18 IST


Caolan McNamara said:

> Well fair nuff, some digging throws up the showstopper problem that I can't
> actually do it the 100% natural way, but have to instead fall back to some
> standard (ish) ipc route to communicate between the Server and Client (though
> doors, see later on), do appear to do most of what D11 would require.

BTW one thing you could do that would probably be of a higher speed than
vanilla X11 would be to send data in plain structs without marshalling.

I would imagine (I've never looked though) that X11 does some kind of
marshalling of data to make it byte-order, byte-size, etc. independent.

If D11 is just running on one machine, you don't need that kind of thing.
You may even be able to write some of the data from client to server
without a copy (apart from what TCP/IP itself does).

Dunno, but it's an idea,

--j.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu 06 Feb 2003 - 13:04:26 GMT