RE: [ILUG] iptables

From: Brian O'Donoghue (Brian.ODonoghue at domain kbs.ie)
Date: Thu 06 Jun 2002 - 17:32:42 IST

Next message: Conor Daly: "Re: [ILUG] I thought you didn't have to fight postfix..."
Previous message: John P. Looney: "Re: [ILUG] iptables"
Maybe in reply to: Nils Olofsson: "[ILUG] iptables"
Next in thread: ger: "Re: [ILUG] iptables"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

DoublePlusCool.

-----Original Message-----
From: John P. Looney [mailto:john at domain antefacto.com]
Sent: 06 June 2002 17:28
To: 'ilug at domain linux.ie'
Subject: Re: [ILUG] iptables

On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 05:39:22PM +0100, Brian O'Donoghue mentioned:
> iptables -A INPUT -p tcp -s ! 10.0.0.0/24 -m state --state NEW -j LOG
> iptables -A INPUT -p tcp -s ! 10.0.0.0/24 -m state --state NEW -j DROP
>
> Could someone tell me if the DROP command will actually be hit?

Yep, it will. It returns from LOG lines.

John

-- 
_______________________________________
John Looney             Chief Scientist
a n t e f a c t o     t: +353 1 8586004
www.antefacto.com     f: +353 1 8586014
-- 
Irish Linux Users' Group: ilug at domain linux.ie
http://www.linux.ie/mailman/listinfo/ilug for (un)subscription information.
List maintainer: listmaster at domain linux.ie

Next message: Conor Daly: "Re: [ILUG] I thought you didn't have to fight postfix..."
Previous message: John P. Looney: "Re: [ILUG] iptables"
Maybe in reply to: Nils Olofsson: "[ILUG] iptables"
Next in thread: ger: "Re: [ILUG] iptables"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu 06 Feb 2003 - 13:17:07 GMT