Re: [ILUG] Pedantic distro guilt.

From: Niall James O'Higgins (njo at domain sig11.com)
Date: Thu 20 Jun 2002 - 18:00:20 IST


On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 05:15:03PM +0100, Brian O'Donoghue wrote:
> Ie if
> the admin who comes after me has less patience for Linux then a distro like
> Slackware may be too difficult to troubleshoot and admin and perhaps
> something with gui bells and whistles like Mandrake would be easier for a
> windows buff to admin, thus making Linux's chances of continuity in my
> abscence all the greater?

This is an old argument. First off, what GUI tools does Mandrake actually have that Slackware doesnt?

In my experiences, GUI "admin" tools for unix are a nasty kludge on top of config files. You're better off editing the files by hand.

If I was you, I'd leave Slackware on the machine. Mandrake isnt gonna make it a whole lot easier for a windows admin to take care of Oracle. Slackware is also ALOT less bloated than Mandrake. On a machine of your calibre, every meg of RAM counts.

Just my opinion.

-- 
Niall James O'Higgins | njo at domain sig11.com | http://www.sig11.com 
------------------------------------------------------------
He was a fiddler, and consequently a rogue.
                -- Jonathon Swift


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu 06 Feb 2003 - 13:17:23 GMT