Re: [ILUG] [OT] Spam that was just sent in

From: Thomas Ribbrock (emgaron at domain gmx.net)
Date: Wed 11 Aug 1999 - 20:34:29 IST

Next message: Paul Kelly: "Re: [ILUG] Esheep clone: Feature Request"
Previous message: John P. Looney: "Re: [ILUG] OT: Forbes review of the Irish IT industry"
In reply to: Robert Sweetnam: "[ILUG] [OT] Spam that was just sent in"
Next in thread: Bernard Tyers: "Re: [ILUG] [OT] Spam that was just sent in"
Reply: Bernard Tyers: "Re: [ILUG] [OT] Spam that was just sent in"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On Wed, Aug 11, 1999 at 05:03:23PM +0100, Robert Sweetnam wrote:

> Under Bill S.1618 TITLE III passed by the U.S. Congress this
[...]

> So its law in the US????? I doubt if thats true is it??????
[...]

Your best bet to find out about spam related U.S. laws is probably CAUCE, as
they're lobbying against spam for quite some time.
Try http://www.cauce.org

TRi

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Thomas Ribbrock    http://www.bigfoot.com/~kaytan    ICQ#: 15839919
   "You have to live on the edge of reality - to make your dreams come true!"

Next message: Paul Kelly: "Re: [ILUG] Esheep clone: Feature Request"
Previous message: John P. Looney: "Re: [ILUG] OT: Forbes review of the Irish IT industry"
In reply to: Robert Sweetnam: "[ILUG] [OT] Spam that was just sent in"
Next in thread: Bernard Tyers: "Re: [ILUG] [OT] Spam that was just sent in"
Reply: Bernard Tyers: "Re: [ILUG] [OT] Spam that was just sent in"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu 06 Feb 2003 - 13:04:27 GMT