RE: [ILUG] Package dependencies

From: Kenn Humborg (kenn at domain bluetree.ie)
Date: Tue 25 Jun 2002 - 16:23:05 IST


> Yes the kernel is obviously the most important
> to be optimised, but those who will benefit most
> from it's optimisation will probably be the sort of
> people that re-compile/update their kernel anyway.

About a year or so ago, I gave up compiling my own
kernels. After seeing how much effort Red Hat put into
their kernel (which is quite different from the stock
"Linus" kernel), I decided that it was just too much work
to:

   o Try out different options and patches to optimise
      performance (e.g. different VMs, pre-emption patches,
      etc)

   o Keep up with all the various kernel config options
      (MTRRs and netlink immediately come to mind as "stuff
      that I didn't fully understand and didn't want to
      research just to compile a kernel _right_now_).

   o Work out what options Red Hat's supplied packages
      require from the kernel (netlink comes to mind here
      as well)

So, now I just install Red Hat-supplied kernel RPMs. I reckon
that they can do a much better job of building a good kernel
than I can.

And note that I hack kernels in my spare time, so I'm
not afraid of compiling and understanding them. I've just
kind of given up trying to stay up-to-date with the x86
world. I prefer to spend that time trying to understand
the details of another, more interesting architecture :-)

Later,
Kenn



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu 06 Feb 2003 - 13:17:32 GMT