Re: [ILUG] Signal handling thing

From: David Neary (dneary at domain wanadoo.fr)
Date: Wed 26 Jun 2002 - 11:13:40 IST


Jason Corcoran. wrote:
> The code work's fine for me ( Redhat 7.3)
>
> Jason.

Gah! Yeah - for some reason compiling it with -std=c99 -pedantic
changes the behaviour of signals. I guess that to be maximally
portable, I'd have to use a sigaction call to set SA_NODEFER
and/or SA_NOMASK (portable in posix that is).

I'm guessing that glibc sets functions to one-shot by default if
you're using the ansi C signal.

Cheers,
Dave.

-- 
       David Neary,
    Marseille, France
  E-Mail: bolsh at domain gimp.org


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Thu 06 Feb 2003 - 13:17:33 GMT